Mercados nocivos: el caso del mercado sexual de la pornografía
Reflexiones a partir de la teoría de Debra Satz
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5347/isonomia.57/2022.648Palavras-chave:
mercado sexual, pornografía, igualdad, autonomía sexualResumo
Mercados Nocivos: O Caso da Indústria Pornográfica a partir da Teoria de Debra Satz.
O artigo tem como objetivo realizar uma análise do mercado da pornografia e o seu impacto na desigualdade e subordinação das mulheres. Com base no estudo teórico sobre a prostituição de Debra Satz (2010), argumentaremos que a pornografia é um mercado prejudicial. Com base nesta afirmação, estudaremos a diferença entre este mercado e outros que têm efeitos semelhantes. Em seguida, consideraremos os custos e benefícios em termos de direitos, bem como as possibilidades fáticas e a eficácia das medidas proibitivas para a sua regulação. Concluímos que, embora a pornografia seja um mercado moralmente censurável, daqui não decorre que deva ser necessariamente proibida pelo estado.
Referências
Anderson, Elizabeth, 1993: Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Anderson, Scott, 2002: “Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy. Making Sense of the Prohibition of Prostitution”. Ethics, Vol. 112, pp. 748-780.
Biddle, Ian, y Knights, Vanessa (eds.), 2007: Music, National Identity and the Politics of Location. London, Routlege.
Bohlman, Philip V., 2004: The Music of European Nationalism: Cultural Identity and Modern History. Santa Barbara (Ca.), ABC-CLIO.
Brennan, Jason y Jaworski, Peter, 2015: Markets without Limits: Moral Virtues and Commercial Interests. New York, Routledge.
Burns, Lori y Lafrance, Mélisse, 2002: Disruptive Divas: Feminism, Identity & Popular Music. New York, Ashgate.
Caicedo, Patricia, 2019: The Latin American Art Song: Sounds of the Imagined Nations. Lanham, Lexington Books.
Comella Lynn y Tarrant, Shira (eds.), 2015: New Views on Pornography. Sexuality, Politics and the Law. Oxford, Praeger.
Dyzenhaus, David, 1992: “John Stuart Mill and the Harm of Pornography. Ethics, Vol. 102, No. 3, pp. 534-55.
Duggan, Lisa y Hunter, Nan D., 2006: Sex Wars. Sexual Dissident and Political Culture. New York, Routledge.
Dworkin, Andrea, 1981: Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London, Women's Press.
________, 1988. Letters from a War Zone. New York, E.P. Dutton.
Dworkin, Andrea. y MacKinnon, Catharine, 1988: Pornography and Civil Rights: A New Day for Women's Equality. Minneapolis, Organizing Against Pornography.
________, 1997: In Harm's Way: The Pornography Civil Rights Hearings. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, Ronald, 1985: A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
________, 1994. “Pornografía, feminismo y libertad”. Debate Feminista, Vol. 9, pp. 9-103.
________, 1996. Freedom’s Law. The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Egaña Rojas, Lucía, 2017: Atrincheradas en la carne. Lecturas en torno a prácticas postpornográficas. Barcelona, Ediciones Bellaterra.
Emerson, Thomas I., 1984: “Pornography and the First Amendment: A Reply to Professor MacKinnon”. Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 3, pp. 130-143.
Fiss, Owen, 1996: The Irony of Free Speech. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Green Lucy (ed.), 2011: Learning, Teaching, and Musical Identity: Voices across Cultures. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
Iglesias Skulj, Agustina, 2014: La trata de mujeres con fines de explotación sexual. Buenos Aires, Didot.
Itzin, Catherine, 1990: “Pornography and Civil Liberties”. Index on Censorship, Vol. 9, pp. 12-13.
Lacey, Nicola, 1993: “Theory into Practice? Pornography and the Public/Private Dichotomy”. Journal of Law and Society, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 93-113.
Langton, Rae, 1993: “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts”. Philosophy and Public Affairs¸ Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 293-330.
Leonard, Marion, 2007: Gender in the Music Industry: Rock, Discourse and Girl Power. New York, Ashgate.
Llopis, María, 2010: El posporno era eso. Barcelona, Editorial Melusina.
MacKinnon, Catharine, 1987: Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, Harvard University Press. Citado por la traducción castellana de Teresa Arijón: Feminismo inmodificado. Discursos sobre la vida y el derecho. Buenos Aires, Editorial Siglo XXI, 2014.
________, 1989: Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
________, 1993a: Only Words. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
________, 1993b: “Prostitution and Rights”. Michigan Journal of Gender & Law, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 13-31.
________, 2017: Butterfly Politics. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Michelman, Frank, 1989: “Conceptions of Democracy in American Constitutional Arguments: The Case of Pornography Regulation”. Tenesse Law Review, Vol. 56, pp. 291-319.
Milano, Laura, 2021: El dedo en el porno. R/ Goces entre teoría, feminismos y pornografía. Buenos Aires, Madre Selva.
________, 2014: Usina posporno: disidencia sexual, arte y autogestión en la pospornografía. Buenos Aires, Editorial Título.
Nussbaum, Martha, 1999: Sex and Social Justice. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
________, 1985: “Objectification”. Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 24, No. 4, 249-291.
Owens, Eric W., Richard J. Behun, Jill C. Manning y Rory C. Reid, 2012: “The impact of internet pornography on adolescents: a review of the research”. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, Vol. 19, No. 1–2, pp. 99–122.
Pacini Hernandez, Deborah, 2009: Oye Como Va! Hybridity and Identity in Latino Popular Music. Philadelphia, Temple University Press.
Peter, Jochen y Valkenburg, Patti M, 2016: “Adolescents and pornography: a review of 20 years of research”. The Journal of Sex Research, Vol. 53, No. 4-5, pp. 509-531.
Post, Robert, 1988: “Cultural Heterogenity and Law: Pornography, Blasphemy and the First Amendment”. California Law Review, Vol. 76, pp. 297-335.
Ross, Becki L., 2000: “It’s Merely Designed for Sexual Arousal: Interrogating the Indefensibility of Lesbian Smut”. Drucilla Cornell (ed.). Feminism & Pornography. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 264-317.
Royalle, Candida, 2000: “Porn in the USA”. Drucilla Cornell (ed.). Feminism & Pornography. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 540-550.
Salanova, Marisol, 2011: Postpornografía. Murcia, Pictografía Ediciones.
Sandel, Michael J., 2013: What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York, Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
Satz, Debra, 2010, Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. New York, Oxford University Press. Citado por la traducción castellana de Hugo Salas: ¿Por qué algunas cosas no deberían estar en venta? Los límites morales del mercado. Buenos Aires, Siglo XXI Editores, 2015.
Scales, Anne, 2000: “Avoiding Constitutional Depression: Bad Attitudes and the Fate of Butler”. Drucilla Cornell (ed.). Feminism & Pornography. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 318-344.
Sunstein, Cass, 1986: Pornography and the First Amendment. Duke Law Journal, Vol. 4, pp. 589-627.
Srinivasan, Amia, 2021: The Right to Sex. London, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Strossen, Nadine, 1987: “The convergence of feminist and civil liberties principles in the pornography debate”. NYU Law Review, Vol. 62, pp. 201-235.
________, 1993: “Feminist Critique of the Feminist Critique of Pornography”. Virginia Law Review, Vol. 79, pp. 1099-1190.
________, 1995: “Defending Pornography: Free Speech, Sex, and the Fight for Women's Rights”. University of Richmond Law Review, Vol. 29, No. 2, pp. 401-420.
________, 1996: “Hate speech and pornography: Do we have to choose between freedom of speech and equality?”. Case Western Reserve Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 449-478.
Taormino, Tristan, Mireille Miller-Young, Constance Penley y Celine Parreñas Shimizu, 2012: The Feminist Porn Book. New York, The Feminist Press. Citado por la traducción castellana de Begoña Martinez: Porno feminista: Las políticas de producir placer. Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Ed. Melusina, 2016.
Taylor, Jodie, 2012: Playing it queer: popular music, identity and queer world-making. Switzerland, Peter Lang.
Watchirs Smith, Lucy, Bette Liu, Louisa Degenhardt, Juliet Richters, George Patton, Handan Wand, Donna Cross, Jane S. Hocking, S. Rachel Skinner, Spring Cooper, Catharine Lumby, John M. Kaldor y Rebecca Guy: 2016: “Is sexual content in new media linked to sexual risk behaviour in young people? A systematic review and meta-analysis”. Sexual Health, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 501–515.
Whiteley, Sheila, 2000: Women and Popular Music: Sexuality, Identity and Subjectivity. New York, Routledge.
Wright, Paul J., Robert S. Tokunaga, y Ashley Kraus, 2016: “A Meta-Analysis of Pornography Consumption and Actual Acts of Sexual Aggression in General Population Studies”. Journal of Communication, Vol. 66 No. 1, pp. 183–205.
West, Caroline, 2003: “The Free Speech Argument against Pornography”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 33, No. 3, 391-422.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del drecho
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ITAM, responsable de la publicación de la Revista, tiene los derechos de autor sobre los artículos publicados y el resto de las contribuciones. Las publicaciones están en acceso abierto y bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Esto significa, entre otras cosas, que los autores pueden compartir libremente sus artículos, una vez publicados en Isonomía, en sus páginas web personales, Academia.edu, etc. Entre la aceptación formal y la publicación en línea, los autores pueden compartir los borradores finales de sus artículos. En cambio, los autores deben pedir permiso para reproducir o reimprimir el trabajo, y mencionar, en la primera nota a pie de página, "publicado previamente en Isonomía, año, n. x, pp. xx-xx".
