¿Garantismo extremo o mesurado? La legitimidad de la función jurisdiccional penal

construyendo el debate Ferrajoli-Laudan

Authors

  • Edgar R. Aguilera García Centro de Investigación en Ciencias Jurídicas, Justicia Penal y Seguridad Pública, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5347/40.2014.98

Keywords:

“garantismo”, legal epistemology, criminal adjudication, due process, Ferrajoli, Laudan

Abstract

Extreme or Moderate “Garantismo”? The Legitimacy of Criminal Law Adjudication: Setting the Foundations of a Debate Between Ferrajoli and Laudan

The aim of the article is to analyze two versions of the argument that portrays truth-seeking as a legitimizing factor in criminal law adjudication: Ferrajoli’s and Laudan’s. The careful examination of their proposals, the author contends, may give us rational (as opposed to merely emotive) grounds to decide whether to subscribe to an extreme or to a moderate version of “garantismo”. This decision becomes relevant in the context of the theoretical debate regarding the appropriate attributes of criminal proceeding models.

Downloads

Published

2014-08-31

How to Cite

Aguilera García, E. R. (2014). ¿Garantismo extremo o mesurado? La legitimidad de la función jurisdiccional penal: construyendo el debate Ferrajoli-Laudan. Isonomía - Revista De teoría Y filosofía Del Derecho, (40), 61–93. https://doi.org/10.5347/40.2014.98

Issue

No. 40 (2014): Isonomía 40

Section

Research Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2014 Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ITAM, the publisher, has the copyright of published articles and remaining types of publications. Publications are in open access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. That means, among other things, that authors can freely share their articles, once published in Isonomía, on their personal web pages, Academia.edu, etc.. Between formal acceptance and online publication, authors can share the final drafts of their articles. In contrast, authors must seek permission to reproduce or reprint work, and mention, in the first footnote, "previously published in Isonomía, year, n. x, pp. xx-xx"..