El problema de los hechos en la justificación de sentencias

Authors

  • Ricardo Caracciolo Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Facultad de Derecho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5347/38.2013.118

Keywords:

Judicial decision, application of norms, normative justification, truth

Abstract

The Problem of Facts in the Justification of Judicial Decisions

This paper presents an argument to support the claim that the descriptive propositions about the facts of the case, which are an ordinary component of contemporary judicial decisions, must meet a truth requirement. This requirement is, therefore, a criterion of justification of judicial decisions. To build the argument, the article resorts to the analysis of the concepts of “judicial decisions”, “application” of general norms and “normative justification”. In addition, it reviews several forms of kelsenian skepticism on the truth requirement and holds that they fail.

Published

2013-04-30

How to Cite

Caracciolo, R. (2013). El problema de los hechos en la justificación de sentencias. Isonomía - Revista De teoría Y filosofía Del Derecho, (38), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.5347/38.2013.118

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.